Connect with us

Social

CrashPlan for Small Business Review

Published

on

CrashPlan for Small Business, by Code42, delivers unlimited storage, unlimited file version restoration and top-notch security. For these reasons, in addition to its robust backup features, we recommend CrashPlan for Small Business.

CrashPlan for Small Business Pricing and Plans

CrashPlan for Small Business has a very straightforward pricing model. The company charges $10 per computer, per month. You can protect external hard drives at no additional cost. It comes with unlimited storage space, unlimited file version restoration, file server protection and dedicated support.

There are no setup or restoration fees; customers can cancel service at any time. The company offers a one-month free trial.  

Code42 is an expanded version of CrashPlan that is intended for enterprises with more than 200 employees. You’ll need to contact Code42 for a quote. Pricing is contingent on your company’s needs and desired features.

CrashPlan Features

Here are the features that impressed us the most about CrashPlan for Small Business.

Ease Of Use

CrashPlan for Small Business provides unlimited backup without restrictions on file types. The browser-based dashboard is complete with alerts, automated reports, and you can easily change your backup settings at any time.

Customizable

Employees can be added and removed at any time, and pricing is adjusted accordingly. Crashplan offers customizable file versioning and retention: You determine how many versions of a document you want to retail and how long you want to store your files.

Intuitive Performance and Design

CrashPlan’s data backup runs continuously and unobtrusively in the background, freeing you of the need to monitor whether your data has been backed up. CrashPlan’s desktop application is user friendly and intuitive. There is also an online administration console you can log into through any web browser where you can control bandwidth and permissions, and view that status of your backup activity in real time.

Security

Sufficient security must exist both with where your information is stored and during the uploading process, when it’s vulnerable. CrashPlan uses 256-bit AES data encryption. Further, the company has signed a BAA (business associate agreement) as part of its compliance with HIPAA.

Customer Support

We posed as small business owners to test CrashPlan’s customer support. Agents responded to our inquiries quickly, providing clear, helpful and detailed responses. Its agents did not push to make a sale, and, instead, were very helpful and polite.

Code42, the parent company of CrashPlan for Small Business, is accredited with the Better Business Bureau and has an A+ rating.

Limitations

There are a few drawbacks with CrashPlan for Small Business, including the following.

  • Strictly an online backup solution: CrashPlan for Small Business is solely a backup solution, not a cloud storage service you can use to transfer files or collaborate with others. It does, however, easily integrate with other cloud solutions like Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive.
  • Mobile backup isn’t available: It lacks a mobile app for Android and iOS devices. This may not be an issue if you only plan to back up desktops, laptops, or servers; however, if you need to back up your mobile devices, consider another provider.

The Verdict

CrashPlan for Small Business is an easy-to-use solution for data protection and backup. Running silently in the background, your business’s data is protected from disasters or attacks.

CrashPlan Cloud Backup

Continue Reading

Social

Twitter bans James O’Keefe of Project Veritas over fake account policy – TechCrunch

Published

on

Twitter has banned right-wing provocateur James O’Keefe, creator of political gotcha video producer Project Veritas, for violating its “platform manipulation and spam policy,” suggesting he was operating multiple accounts in an unsanctioned way. O’Keefe has already announced that he will sue the company for defamation.

The ban, or “permanent suspension” as Twitter calls it, occurred Thursday afternoon. A Twitter representative said the action followed the violation of rules prohibiting “operating fake accounts” and attempting to “artificially amplify or disrupt conversations through the use of multiple accounts,” as noted here.

This suggests O’Keefe was banned for operating multiple accounts, outside the laissez-faire policy that lets people have a professional and a personal account, and that sort of thing.

But sharp-eyed users noticed that O’Keefe’s last tweet unironically accused reporter Jesse Hicks of impersonation, including an image showing an unredacted phone number supposedly belonging to Hicks. This too may have run afoul of Twitter’s rules about posting personal information, but Twitter declined to comment on this when I asked.

Supporters of O’Keefe say that the company removed his account as retribution for his most recent “exposé” involving surreptitious recordings of a CNN employee admitting the news organization has a political bias. (The person he was talking to had, impersonating a nurse, matched with him on Tinder.)

For his part O’Keefe said he would be suing Twitter for defamation over the allegation that he operated fake accounts. I’ve contacted Project Veritas for more information.

Continue Reading

Social

Consumer groups and child development experts petition Facebook to drop ‘Instagram for kids’ plan – TechCrunch

Published

on

A coalition of 35 consumer advocacy groups along with 64 experts in child development have co-signed a letter to Facebook asking the company to reconsider its plans to launch a version of Instagram for children under the age of 13, which Facebook has confirmed to be in development. In the letter, the groups and experts argue that social media is linked with several risk factors for younger children and adolescents, related to both their physical health and overall well-being.

The letter was written by the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood, an advocacy group that often leads campaigns against big tech and its targeting of children.

The group stresses how influential social media is on young people’s development, and the dangers such an app could bring:

“A growing body of research demonstrates that excessive use of digital devices and social media is harmful to adolescents. Instagram, in particular, exploits young people’s fear of missing out and desire for peer approval to encourage children and teens to constantly check their devices and share photos with their followers,” it states. “The platform’s relentless focus on appearance, self-presentation, and branding presents challenges to adolescents’ privacy and wellbeing. Younger children are even less developmentally equipped to deal with these challenges, as they are learning to navigate social interactions, friendships, and their inner sense of strengths and challenges during this crucial window of development,” the letter reads.

Citing public health research and other studies, the letter notes that excessive screen time and social media use can contribute to a variety of risks for kids including obesity, lower psychological well-being, decreased quality of sleep, increased risk of depression and suicide ideation, and other issues. Adolescent girls report feeling pressured to post sexualized selfies for attention from their peers, the letter said, and 59% of U.S. teens have reported being bullied in social media, as well.

Another concern the groups have is the use of the Instagram algorithm which could suggest what kids would see and click on next, noting that children are “highly persuadable.”

They also point out that Facebook knows there are already children under 13 who have lied about their age using the Instagram platform, and these users will be unlikely to migrate to what they’ll view as a more “babyish” version of the app than the one they’re already using. That means Facebook is really targeting an even younger age group who don’t yet have an Instagram account with this “kids version.”

Despite the concerns being raised, Instagram’s plans to compete for younger users will not likely be impacted by the outcry. Already, Instagram’s top competitor in social media today — TikTok — has developed an experience for kids under 13. In fact, it was forced to age-gate its app as a result of its settlement with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which had investigated Musical.ly (the app that became TikTok) for violations of the U.S. children’s privacy law COPPA.

Facebook, too, could be in a similar situation where it has to age-gate Instagram in order to properly direct its existing underage users to a COPPA-compliant experience. At the very least, Facebook has grounds to argue that it shouldn’t have to boot the under-13 crowd off its app, since TikTok did not. And the FTC’s fines, even when historic, barely make a dent in tech giants’ revenues.

The advocacy groups’ letter follows a push from Democratic lawmakers, who also this month penned a letter addressed to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg to express concerns over Facebook’s ability to protect kids’ privacy and their well-being. Their letter had specifically cited Messenger Kids, which was once found to have a design flaw that let kids chat with unauthorized users. The lawmakers gave Facebook until April 26 to respond to their questions.

Zuckerberg confirmed Facebook’s plans for an Instagram for kids at a Congressional hearing back in March, saying that the company was “early in our thinking” about how the app would work, but noted it would involve some sort of parental oversight and involvement. That’s similar to what Facebook offers today via Messenger Kids and TikTok does via its Family Pairing parental controls.

The market, in other words, is shifting towards acknowledging that kids are already on social media — with or without parents’ permission. As a result, companies are building features and age gates to accommodate that reality. The downside to this plan, of course, is once you legitimize the creation of social apps for the under-13 demographic, companies are given the legal right to hook kids even younger on what are, arguably, risky experiences from a public health standpoint.

The Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood also today launched a petition which others can sign to push Facebook to cancel its plans for an Instagram for kids.

Instagram Letter by TechCrunch on Scribd

Continue Reading

Social

Facebook to test new business discovery features in U.S. News Feed – TechCrunch

Published

on

Facebook announced this morning it will begin testing a new experience for discovering businesses in its News Feed in the U.S. When live, users to tap on topics they’re interested in underneath posts and ads in their News Feed in order to explore related content from businesses. The change comes at a time when Facebook has been arguing how Apple’s App Tracking Transparency update will impact its small business customers — a claim many have dismissed as misleading, but nevertheless led some mom and pop shops to express concern about the impacts to their ad targeting capabilities, as a result. This new test is an example of how easily Facebook can tweak its News Feed to build out more data on its users, if needed.

The company suggests users may see the change under posts and ads from businesses selling beauty products, fitness or clothing, among other things.

The idea here is that Facebook would direct users to related businesses through a News Feed feature, when they take a specific action to discover related content. This, in turn, could help Facebook create a new set of data on its users, in terms of which users clicked to see more, and what sort of businesses they engaged with, among other things. Over time, it could turn this feature into an ad unit, if desired, where businesses could pay for higher placement.

“People already discover businesses while scrolling through News Feed, and this will make it easier to discover and consider new businesses they might not have found on their own,” the company noted in a brief announcement.

Facebook didn’t detail its further plans with the test, but said as it learned from how users interacted with the feature, it will expand the experience to more people and businesses.

Image Credits: Facebook

Along with news of the test, Facebook said it will roll out more tools for business owners this month, including the ability to create, publish and schedule Stories to both Facebook and Instagram; make changes and edits to Scheduled Posts; and soon, create and manage Facebook Photos and Albums from Facebook’s Business Suite. It will also soon add the ability to create and save Facebook and Instagram posts as drafts from the Business Suite mobile app.

Related to the businesses updates, Facebook updated features across ad products focused on connecting businesses with customer leads, including Lead Ads, Call Ads, and Click to Messenger Lead Generations.

Facebook earlier this year announced a new Facebook Page experience that gave businesses the ability to engage on the social network with their business profile for things like posting, commenting and liking, and access to their own, dedicated News Feed. And it had removed the Like button in favor of focusing on Followers.

It is not a coincidence that Facebook is touting its tools for small businesses at a time when there’s concern — much of it loudly shouted by Facebook itself — that its platform could be less useful to small business owners in the near future, when ad targeting capabilities becomes less precise as users vote ‘no’ when Facebook’s iOS app asks if it can track them.

Continue Reading

Trending